Updated October 17, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
Cirrascale vs ScalaHosting
Compare Cirrascale and ScalaHosting using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
Where Cirrascale and ScalaHosting differ
| Fact | Cirrascale | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| SLA uptime | 99.5% | 99.9%Higher |
| Entry price | $329 | Not confirmed |
| Entry plan | 1x Qualcomm AI 100 Pro, 12 vCPU, 48 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | Not confirmed |
| Bandwidth allowance | No ingress/egress data fees | Not confirmed |
| Billing models | Monthly, Reserved | Not confirmed |
| Locations | 3 | Not confirmed |
| Regions | US | Not confirmed |
| Compliance certifications | HIPAA, PCI DSS | Not confirmed |
| Server types | Bare metal | Not confirmed |
Key differences
- Cirrascale scores higher overall: 9.40 vs 8.30.
- Support channels: only Cirrascale offers Email, Phone, Help centre.
- Support channels: only ScalaHosting offers Chat.
- SLA uptime is higher at ScalaHosting: 99.9% vs 99.5%.
- Founded is lower at ScalaHosting: 2007 vs 2015.
Score breakdown
| Area | Cirrascale | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 9.60GPU hours from $0.27, and data transfer is No egress or ingress data transfer fees. | Not confirmed |
| Offer | 9.20HigherAccelerator choice spans AMD Instinct MI325X, AMD Instinct MI300X and AMD Instinct MI250, with certifications HIPAA and PCI DSS. | 8.10 |
| Trust | 9.10Higher | 8.80 |
Availability and regulation
| Country | Cirrascale | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | United States | Not confirmed |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Cirrascale | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Cirrascale Cloud Services | Not confirmed |
| Headquarters | United States | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 2015 | 2007Lower |
| Support channels | Email, Phone, Help centre | Chat |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.