Updated September 28, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
Clyso vs ConoHa
Compare Clyso and ConoHa using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
Where Clyso and ConoHa differ
| Fact | Clyso | ConoHa |
|---|---|---|
| Storage types | Object, BlockCovers more | Object |
Same on both: S3-compatible (Yes).
Key differences
- Support channels: only Clyso offers Email, Phone.
- Founded is lower at ConoHa: 1995 vs 2010.
- Storage types: only Clyso offers Block.
Score breakdown
| Area | Clyso | ConoHa |
|---|---|---|
| Offer | 9.00Higher | 8.10 |
| Trust | 9.40 | 9.80Higher |
How they score
Clyso
- Offer9.0
- Trust9.4
ConoHa
- Offer8.1
- Trust9.8
- Clyso edges ConoHa on offer, 9.0 to 8.1.
- On trust the two are close: ConoHa 9.8, Clyso 9.4.
Which one suits you
Pick Clyso if offer and storage types matter most.
Pick ConoHa if trust matter most.
Where each is licensed and available
| Country | Clyso | ConoHa |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Germany | Not confirmed |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Clyso | ConoHa |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | CLYSO GmbH | GMO Internet, Inc. |
| Headquarters | Germany | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 2010 | 1995Lower |
| Support channels | Email, Phone, Help centreCovers more | Help centre |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.