Updated October 18, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
ConoHa vs Easy-Hebergement
Compare ConoHa and Easy-Hebergement using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
Where ConoHa and Easy-Hebergement differ
| Fact | ConoHa | Easy-Hebergement |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not confirmed | €16.99 |
| Billing models | Not confirmed | Monthly |
| Use cases | Game server | Not confirmed |
| Operating systems | Linux, Windows | Not confirmed |
Same on both: Server types (VPS).
Key differences
- Support channels: only Easy-Hebergement offers Phone.
- Founded is lower at ConoHa: 1995 vs 2002.
Score breakdown
| Area | ConoHa | Easy-Hebergement |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Not confirmed | 8.40 |
| Offer | 8.10 | 8.40Higher |
| Trust | 9.80Higher | 9.30 |
Which one suits you
Pick ConoHa if trust matter most.
Pick Easy-Hebergement if offer matter most.
Area by area
ConoHa
- Offer8.1
- Trust9.8
Easy-Hebergement
- Offer8.4
- Trust9.3
- On offer the two are close: Easy-Hebergement 8.4, ConoHa 8.1.
- ConoHa leads on trust by 0.5 points (9.8 vs 9.3).
Where each is licensed and available
| Country | ConoHa | Easy-Hebergement |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Not confirmed | France |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | ConoHa | Easy-Hebergement |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | GMO Internet, Inc. | SWIIPTEL SAS |
| Headquarters | Not confirmed | France |
| Founded | 1995Lower | 2002 |
| Support channels | Help centre | Phone, Help centreCovers more |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.