Updated September 29, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
ConoHa vs PlanetHoster
Compare ConoHa and PlanetHoster using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
What sets them apart
| Fact | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| Operating systems | Linux, WindowsCovers more | Linux |
| Entry price | Not confirmed | $48.99 |
| Entry plan | Not confirmed | 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 40 GB NVMe SSD |
| Bandwidth allowance | Not confirmed | Unlimited traffic, 1 Gbit/s connection |
| Billing models | Not confirmed | Monthly |
| Locations | Not confirmed | 3 |
| Regions | Not confirmed | FR, CH, CA |
| DDoS protection | Not confirmed | Yes |
| SLA uptime | Not confirmed | 99.9% |
| Compliance certifications | Not confirmed | ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR, Tier III, Tier IV, ICANN, CIRA, AFNIC |
Same on both: Server types (VPS), Use cases (Game server).
Score breakdown
| Area | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Not confirmed | 8.20Monthly billing without hourly choice shapes entry spend at monthly |
| Offer | 8.10 | 9.10HigherGenerous transfer allowance described in Unlimited traffic, 1 Gbit/s connection lifts usable value |
| Trust | 9.80Higher | 9.10Broad assurance set named in ISO 27001, SOC 2 and PCI DSS supports confidence |
Side by side, item by item
| Server types | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| VPS | Yes | Yes |
| Use cases | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| Game server | Yes | Yes |
| Operating systems | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | No |
Every fact side by side
| Fact | ConoHa | PlanetHoster |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | GMO Internet, Inc. | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 1995 | Not confirmed |
| Support channels | Help centre | Not confirmed |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.