Updated October 17, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
Core Scientific vs ScalaHosting
Compare Core Scientific and ScalaHosting using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
Core Scientific vs ScalaHosting: the differences
| Fact | Core Scientific | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| SLA uptime | 99.999%Higher | 99.9% |
| Locations | 10 | Not confirmed |
| Regions | US | Not confirmed |
Key differences
- Support channels: only Core Scientific offers Email, Phone.
- Support channels: only ScalaHosting offers Chat.
- SLA uptime is higher at Core Scientific: 99.999% vs 99.9%.
- Founded is lower at ScalaHosting: 2007 vs 2017.
Score breakdown
| Area | Core Scientific | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Offer | 9.00Higher | 8.10 |
| Trust | 9.40Higher | 8.80 |
Availability and regulation
| Country | Core Scientific | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | United States | Not confirmed |
Winner by area
Core Scientific
- Offer9.0
- Trust9.4
ScalaHosting
- Offer8.1
- Trust8.8
- Core Scientific leads on offer by 0.9 points (9.0 vs 8.1).
- On trust the two are close: Core Scientific 9.4, ScalaHosting 8.8.
Every fact side by side
| Fact | Core Scientific | ScalaHosting |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Core Scientific, Inc. | Not confirmed |
| Headquarters | United States | Not confirmed |
| Founded | 2017 | 2007Lower |
| Support channels | Email, Phone | Chat |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.