Updated October 17, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting

Compare Galaxy Backbone and ScalaHosting using recorded catalog facts and pricing.

What sets them apart

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting
FactGalaxy BackboneScalaHosting
SLA uptime99%99.9%Higher
Entry planGXCP dedicated virtual machineNot confirmed
Locations2Not confirmed
RegionsNGNot confirmed
Compliance certificationsISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 20000 1, ISO 22301, ISO 9001, NDPRNot confirmed
Server typesVPSNot confirmed

Key differences

  • Galaxy Backbone scores higher overall: 8.60 vs 8.30.
  • Support channels: only Galaxy Backbone offers Email, Phone, Help centre.
  • Support channels: only ScalaHosting offers Chat.
  • SLA uptime is higher at ScalaHosting: 99.9% vs 99%.
  • Founded is lower at Galaxy Backbone: 2006 vs 2007.

Score breakdown

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting
AreaGalaxy BackboneScalaHosting
Offer8.60HigherThe offer pairs ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 20000 1 and ISO 22301 with server types limited to vps and no published hardware figures.8.10
Trust8.808.80

Choosing between them

Pick Galaxy Backbone if offer matter most.

Pick ScalaHosting if sla uptime matter most.

How they score

Galaxy Backbone

  • Offer8.6
  • Trust8.8

ScalaHosting

  • Offer8.1
  • Trust8.8
  • Galaxy Backbone edges ScalaHosting on offer, 8.6 to 8.1.
  • Trust is level, 8.8 each.

Where each is licensed and available

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting
CountryGalaxy BackboneScalaHosting
HeadquartersNigeriaNot confirmed

Every fact side by side

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting
FactGalaxy BackboneScalaHosting
Legal entityGalaxy Backbone LimitedNot confirmed
HeadquartersNigeriaNot confirmed
Founded2006Lower2007
Support channelsEmail, Phone, Help centreChat

Country by country

Galaxy Backbone vs ScalaHosting
CountryGalaxy BackboneScalaHosting
NigeriaYesNo

Compare other items

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.