Updated September 28, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
LiteLLM vs Portkey
Compare LiteLLM and Portkey using recorded catalog facts and pricing.
What sets them apart
| Fact | LiteLLM | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Fee model | Open-source self-host free forever ($0, MIT licence); Enterprise annual licence priced to annual gateway request capacity, never per token | Free Developer plan (Free Forever), Production plan $49/month, Enterprise custom pricing; $9/month per additional 100k requests over limit |
| Providers routed | 140 | from 1,600 |
Same on both: Bring your own key (Yes), OpenAI-compatible API (Yes), Free tier (Yes).
Score breakdown
| Area | LiteLLM | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 9.20 | 9.20 |
| Offer | 9.10Self-host free forever on an MIT licence, bring your own key, and 140 providers routed behind an OpenAI-compatible API. | 9.10 |
| Trust | 8.70 | Not confirmed |
Licences and countries
| Country | LiteLLM | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
Area by area
LiteLLM
- Cost9.2
- Offer9.1
Portkey
- Cost9.2
- Offer9.1
- LiteLLM and Portkey tie on cost at 9.2.
- No winner on offer: both score 9.1.
Every fact side by side
| Fact | LiteLLM | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Berrie AI Incorporated | Portkey, Inc |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2023 | Not confirmed |
| Support channels | Email, Help centre, CommunityCovers more | Help centre, Community |
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.