Updated September 29, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team
Top managed databases compared
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score. How we rank
| Order | Provider | Score | Features | Key facts | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91 |  Neo4j AuraPartner AuraDB Professional 14-day free trial | 8.7/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
| 92 |  NotionPartner | 8.7/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
| 93 |  SafespringPartner | 8.7/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
| 94 |  TurbopufferPartner | 8.7/10 |
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives | |
| 95 |  UbicloudPartner | 8.7/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
| 96 |  AstronomerPartner Astro Hosted evaluation (no-fee trial): 30 days | 8.6/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
| 97 |  PlanetScalePartner | 8.6/10 |
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives | |
| 98 |  Engine YardPartner 14 day free trial: 14 days, no credit card required | 8.5/10 |
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives | |
| 99 |  MaterializePartner 7-day free trial: Free for 7 days | 8.5/10 |
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives | |
| 100 |  Nomic AIPartner Free trial with $20 of AI usage | 8.4/10 |
|
| ReviewCompareSee alternatives |
About Top managed databases compared
Managed database plans differ most in what a team pays to start and what it pays once the plan renews. This ranking covers 171 brands in the databases category and lines each up on entry price, plan coverage and where the service runs. The median entry price is €4.38, the lower quartile €3.07 and the upper quartile €9.05, so the gap between the cheapest start and a typical plan is wide. A free tier is close to standard, with 84.5% of brands offering one against 15.5% that do not. Monthly billing dominates at 82.5%, hourly billing sits at 77.2%, and reserved terms at 19.3%. Every price in the member notes is an entry price and stays with the plan it belongs to, so a renewal can be read against the same line. Where a provider charges separately for storage, that figure stands on its own.
How we picked
Scores come from weighted inputs. Cost carries 40%, offer carries 40% and trust carries 20%, so entry price and what a plan actually includes decide most of the placement, with the remainder going to how a provider presents itself. Prices and plan details are read from the pricing pages each provider publishes. Support channels come from the support and about pages those same providers run, and company details such as the legal entity, headquarters and founding year come from their own terms, contact and company pages. Category context is drawn from this site's records across 171 brands, which is why medians and quartiles appear rather than averages. Partner listings are placed at the top of the order, though the partner count for this ranking stands at 0. Nothing here rests on a personal account or a signed-up trial. Prices shown are entry prices, and each keeps the plan it belongs to so a renewal can be weighed against the same line.
How we rankOur top picks
4. SberCloud: best for Top pickSberCloud holds the top pick in this ranking, and the reason is reach at entry: it offers a free tier, and support runs on email, phone and chat, a wider set than most of the field. The company is LLC Cloud Technologies (OOO Oblachnye Tekhnologii), INN 7736279160, headquartered in RU, so a team signing outside that market should read the terms before committing. RisingWave, the brand just below, matches the free tier and goes lower on price, with entry plans at $0.23, but its support runs on help centre and community, so a team wanting a direct line trades contact breadth for a cheaper start.
- Price per GB per month: RUB 814.68
- Egress price per GB: RUB 1.15
- Free egress: 10 TB of outgoing traffic per month
Pros
- Outgoing traffic includes 10 TB of outgoing traffic per month each month, so routine transfers cost nothing before RUB 1.15 per GB applies.
- A free tier plus bonus credits for individuals, legal entities and sole proprietors keeps early testing cheap.
- Evolution compute starts at RUB 23.75 with 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 30 GB NVMe, billed hourly.
- GPU capacity covers B300, H100, A100, V100 and A40 from RUB 240 an hour, billed per minute.
Cons
- Kubernetes has no free control plane, so every cluster adds RUB 2.98 on top of the node price.
- Infrastructure sits in RU across 9 locations, so there is no reach outside that market.
- Storage covers object only, so block and file tiers are not part of the same plan.
5. Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud holds its place in this ranking through contact reach: support runs on email, chat and help centre, a wider set than Google Cloud above it, and a free tier gives a team room to test before it commits. The company is Alibaba Cloud (Singapore) Private Limited, founded in 2009. What that support set lacks is a phone line, so an incident falls to email, chat and a help centre. Aiven, the brand below, also offers a free tier, lists entry plans at $5 and names a wider set of engines in Kafka, PostgreSQL and OpenSearch.
- Entry price: $4
- Entry plan: 2 vCPU, 0.5 GiB RAM, 20 GiB ESSD system disk
- Bandwidth allowance: 200 Mbit/s maximum bandwidth
Pros
- The entry server costs $4 and carries 2 vCPU, 0.5 GiB RAM, 20 GiB ESSD system disk, a clear spec for a modest monthly outlay.
- 31 locations cover Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the Americas, far more than the 4 typical count here.
- Billing runs on monthly and reserved terms, and monthly is the pattern shared by 90.8% of the brands compared.
- Free credits sit alongside a free tier, so a project can run across products before any charge begins.
- DDoS protection comes with the compute plans, and object storage is S3-compatible with a free quota for internet egress.
Cons
- Support runs on email, chat and help centre only, and phone support is not among that list.
- Reserved commitments are the least common billing pattern, shared by 15.6% of the brands compared.
- The entry plan is small, with 200 Mbit/s maximum bandwidth, so transfer-heavy workloads need a larger plan.
7. Google CloudGoogle Cloud is in this ranking for the weight of the operator behind it, founded in 2008 and run as Google LLC with a headquarters in US, and for a free tier that lets a team size a workload before signing anything. Support runs on help centre and community, a narrow pair, the same shape RisingWave offers and a step back from the contact breadth at the top of this ranking. Alibaba Cloud, the brand below, pairs its own free tier with email, chat and help centre, one of the wider sets in the list.
- Control plane price: $0.10
- Free control plane: Yes
- HA control plane price: $0.10
Pros
- The control plane is free, and the paid tier sits at $0.10, close to the site median of €0.06.
- Scale headroom is large: clusters run to 65,000 nodes, well past what most managed offerings in the ranking allow.
- A free tier and $300 in free credits in credits cover early experiments before any spend.
- Egress includes 100 a month for North America transfers, which cuts the $0.12 per-GB rate for small-scale traffic.
- Footprint is wide, with 40 locations and 46 regions, so workloads can sit close to users.
Cons
- The control plane is free only inside the allowance, so sustained clusters bill at $0.10 for the standard tier and $0.10 for the highly available one.
- Egress is charged at $0.12 per GB once the free allowance is used, and traffic to Australia and China is excluded from it.
- Support runs on help centre and community only, so paid and phone channels are not part of the standard offering.
9. UpCloudUpCloud is in this ranking for the reach of its support desk and its staying power, founded in 2011, run as UpCloud Oy and headquartered in FI. Support runs on email, chat and phone, covering email, chat, phone and a help centre, and that direct line matters more than anything else in a managed database. Readers who weigh entry price hardest should look above it. Akamai Cloud (Linode), the brand below, is a longer standing company, founded in 2003, but offers a narrower set in email and help centre.
- Entry price: €3
- Entry plan: 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 10 GB SSD
- Bandwidth allowance: 250 Mbit/s
Pros
- Outbound data costs €0 per GB on every plan, subject to the Fair Transfer Policy, so serving downloads does not add a line to the bill.
- The entry plan at €3 comes in below Aruba at €1.99 and UCloud at $5.34.
- Billing runs hourly and monthly with hourly metering, so a test server can be released in the same hour it was created.
- Servers sit in 15 locations spanning FI, NO and DK, which leaves room to place a box close to its users.
- The managed Kubernetes control plane is free, and nodes start at €3.
Cons
- The highly available control plane option is priced at €60, so a cluster that needs it pays well past the free default.
- Clusters stop at 120 nodes, a low ceiling for large estates.
- Server types cover vps only, so dedicated hardware requirements sit outside the range.
- Object storage at €0.02 per GB per month sits above the site median of €0.01.
What to look for
- Entry price at the start
- The starting rate shows where a plan sits before any usage. The median entry price is €4.38, the lower quartile €3.07 and the upper quartile €9.05, across a spread from €0 to €236.78. Read it beside the plan name, and read it again when the plan renews.
- Free tier or none
- A free tier is the cheapest way to find out whether a managed database fits the workload. Here 84.5% of brands offer one against 15.5% that do not, so the absence of a trial tier is worth noticing rather than ignoring.
- Billing cadence
- Monthly billing is the norm at 82.5%, with hourly at 77.2% and reserved terms at 19.3%. Cadence moves the bill as much as the headline rate does, especially for a database left running overnight.
- Where the service runs
- Location count drives latency and residency, and it varies widely: the median is 6.5, the lower quartile 3 and the upper quartile 25.5, stretching from 1 to 3,000.
- How you reach support
- A database that stops answering needs a human. A help centre is the most common channel here at 89%, with email at 61.6%, community at 67.8%, phone at 34.2% and chat at 27.4%. Check for a direct line before an incident.
- Node and control plane cost
- The bill grows past the entry rate through node and control plane charges. The median starting node price is €10.09 and the median control plane price is €0.09, so a cheap entry plan can still carry a running fee.
Frequently asked questions
Which brand in this ranking has the lowest entry price?+
RisingWave starts lowest. Its entry plans run $0.23 and it also offers a free tier, so a team can test a workload before paying anything. UCloud follows at $0.96, then Vultr at $2.50. Aiven and Heroku sit at the higher end of the table on their own published figures. All of these are entry prices, and each keeps the plan it belongs to.
Which of these providers offer a free tier?+
Several do. SberCloud, RisingWave, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Aiven all offer a free tier, which covers the testing stage for most teams. Heroku plans carry none, so a budget there starts with the opening invoice. Across the wider category a free tier is close to standard, with 84.5% of brands offering one against 15.5% that do not.
Do these prices cover renewals as well as the start?+
No. Every figure here is an entry price, the rate a plan starts at, written next to the plan it belongs to. Renewal terms are set by each provider and sit outside what this ranking measures, so a team that cares about the rate after the initial term should read the provider's own pricing page before it commits. Where a provider prices storage or nodes separately, that figure is shown on its own rather than folded into the entry price.
Which brand offers the widest choice of database engines?+
Aiven, with Kafka, PostgreSQL and OpenSearch on a single platform. UCloud lists MySQL, PostgreSQL and MongoDB, and Heroku lists PostgreSQL, Redis and Kafka. Breadth matters to a team consolidating several stores under a single vendor and bill, since each extra engine is another plan to price. Where a brand's entry position rests on contact and cost rather than engines, the member note says so.
How do you get help from these providers?+
Support varies more than price does. SberCloud lists email, phone and chat and UpCloud lists email, chat and phone, both reaching phone and chat. RisingWave lists help centre and community, Vultr lists help centre and community and Google Cloud lists help centre and community, which is a help centre and a community. In this category a help centre is the most common channel at 89%, with email at 61.6%.
Where are these companies based?+
Headquarters differ across the list, which matters for data residency and contract terms. Google Cloud sits in US, Vultr in US and Heroku in US. Aiven is in FI and UpCloud in FI, UCloud in HK and SberCloud in RU. The legal entity behind each contract is named in the member notes.