io.net review
Updated September 28, 2026 · DeployCue Editorial Team · Facts checked September 26, 2026
We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.
Our verdict
io.net suits teams that need broad GPU choice across many locations and can plan around hourly metering, but a GPU hour from $2.10 to $3.50 is a departure from the field, so the chip range and reach carry the pitch.
Key facts
- Best for
- Teams that need H100, A100 and RTX 4090 capacity spread across many locations.
- GPU models
- H100, A100, RTX 4090↗
- GPU hour from
- $2.10 to $3.50↗
- Locations
- 130↗
- Legal entity
- io.net, inc.↗
- Founded
- 2022↗
- Support channels
- Help-centre, Community↗
- Pricing model
- Hourly billing
- Official website
- io.net
Facts checked September 26, 2026, 4 sources
Pros and cons
Pros
- Choice of H100, A100 and RTX 4090, a shorter list than the ComputePrices.com set and broader than the consumer cards at Salad
- Capacity spread across 130 locations, well past the 4 median for providers in this group
- Hourly billing as the listed model, simple to forecast for a run of fixed-length jobs
- Runs under the legal entity io.net, inc., founded in 2022
Cons
- Support runs on help centre and community only, so there is no live channel for incidents on a paid cluster
- The GPU hour from $2.10 to $3.50 is a departure from the €0.63 median, so budget assumes the higher end of the range
- Monthly and reserved terms are not among its listed billing models, which cover hourly alone
Who it suits
- Teams training on the datacenter chips in H100, A100 and RTX 4090 that need machines in several regions
- Developers running lighter inference jobs who pay by the hour
- Anyone comfortable with capacity aggregated across many locations rather than a single vendor console
Who should look elsewhere
- Price-first buyers, who will find cheaper entry points among the wider field
- Teams that need phone or chat support during a production incident
- Buyers who want reserved or monthly terms instead of hourly billing
How io.net compares
io.net vs RunPod8.6 vs 9.5
io.net vs ScalaHosting8.6 vs 8.3io.net vs Contabo8.6 vs 9.2
io.net vs Kamatera8.6 vs 9.5
io.net vs Cloudways8.6 vs 9.2
io.net vs PlanetHoster8.6 vs 8.7
io.net vs Acronis8.6 vs 9.9
io.net vs Aruba8.6 vs 9.3
io.net vs Decodo8.6 vs 9.1io.net vs Hostinger8.6 vs 9.1
io.net vs MarsProxies8.6 vs 9.0io.net vs hide.me8.6 vs 8.7
io.net vs Proton Drive8.6 vs 8.3
Frequently asked questions
What does a GPU hour cost on io.net?+
The published floor is $2.10 to $3.50 for a GPU hour, so entry cost sits well above the €0.63 median for the brands ranked on this measure. Real cost depends on the chip you pick from H100, A100 and RTX 4090 and how long the job runs.
Which GPUs can I rent?+
The listed models are H100, A100 and RTX 4090. That covers common datacenter parts for training plus a consumer card for lighter inference, and it is a shorter list than the range at ComputePrices.com.
How is billing handled?+
Hourly is the only billing model, listed as hourly. Monthly and reserved terms are not among it, so a job that runs for days costs the same per hour as a job that finishes quickly, with no commitment discount.
Where can I run these machines?+
Capacity is spread across 130 locations, far above the 4 median for providers in this group. More locations mean more placement choice, though the useful spread depends on where your users and data sit.
How do I get help when something breaks?+
Support runs on help centre and community, meaning a help centre and community channels only. There is no phone or chat route listed, which matters for teams treating a stalled training run as an incident.
Is there a free tier or trial credit?+
The listed billing model is hourly alone, with no free allowance stated next to it in the way other providers list one. Budget for paid GPU hours from the first run rather than planning around a free trial.
Who is behind the service?+
The operator is io.net, inc., a company founded in 2022. The capacity is aggregated from many locations rather than run from a single owned data centre, which shapes how you plan support and commitment.
Should I pick io.net over a hyperscale cloud?+
It fits work where chip choice and location spread matter more than entry price. If the lowest cost per GPU hour is the priority, a broader marketplace such as ComputePrices.com offers a longer chip list to compare against.
Sources
- github.com/ionet-official/docs/blob/HEAD/guides/staking/3... checked September 26, 2026
Backs: Support channels
“reach out to io.net support through Support ticket system”
- io.net/p/best-cloud-gpu-providers-for-ai-ml-2026 checked September 26, 2026
Backs: GPU hour from, GPU models, Locations, Pricing model
“H100 SXM availability at $2.10-$3.50/hr”
- cbinsights.com/company/cluster-protocol checked September 26, 2026
Backs: Founded
“io.net was founded in 2022”
- crunchbase.com/organization/revolution-w-sparkassets-a-s checked September 26, 2026
Backs: Legal entity
“Legal Name io.net, inc.”
Compiled from 4 source pages, checked September 26, 2026. We did not open an account.
Not confirmed yet: Billing granularity, Egress fee.
Related by the facts
io.net
Teams that need H100, A100 and RTX 4090 capacity spread across many locations.