Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 3.1 8B - pricing comparison | DeployCue Skip to content
DeployCue

LLM comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 3.1 8B

Claude Opus 4.8

by Anthropic

Llama 3.1 8B

by Meta 8.0B params
Dimension Claude Opus 4.8 Llama 3.1 8B
Cheapest output $/M $75.00/M $0.050/M
Blended $/M (3:1) $30.00/M $0.035/M
Context window 1000K 128K
Elo score 1430 1180

Frequently asked questions

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 3.1 8B: which is cheaper?
The comparison table marks the winner on each dimension. A green highlight means that side wins on price or capacity for that row.
Should I choose Claude Opus 4.8 or Llama 3.1 8B?
It depends on your workload. Review the per-dimension winners above against your own priorities: price, region coverage, capacity, and availability.
What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.8 and Llama 3.1 8B?
The table breaks down Claude Opus 4.8 and Llama 3.1 8B row by row on price, specs, and coverage so you can see exactly where they diverge.
Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Llama 3.1 8B for AI workloads?
Match the winning dimensions above to your workload. For training, weigh price and capacity; for inference, weigh latency, region coverage, and throughput.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 3.1 8B: which has wider coverage?
The coverage rows compare how broadly Claude Opus 4.8 and Llama 3.1 8B operate. Pick the one with capacity in the regions closest to your users.
Can I switch from Claude Opus 4.8 to Llama 3.1 8B?
In most cases yes, though migration effort varies by product. Compare pricing and coverage above to decide whether switching is worth it for your usage.